Bernabe Zapata Miralles vs Jordi Samper-Montana Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W L W W L
Form
L W L W W L L L W LHead To Head: Miralles 2 - 1 Samper-Montana
They have played 6 sets in total, with Miralles winning 4 and Samper-Montana winning 2. The last match between Miralles and Samper-Montana was at the Spain F20 (Getxo), 07-07-2017, Semifinals, Clay with Bernabe Zapata Miralles getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bernabe Zapata Miralles | 2 |
| Jordi Samper-Montana | 1 |
Spain F20 (Getxo)(07-07-2017)
| Miralles | Stats | Samper-Montana |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (12-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 380 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 37 | Highest Rank | 179 |
| 28 | Age | 35 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 20 |
| 57% (423-325) | Career Total W/L | 56% (442-346) |
| $1,252,255 | Career Prize Money | $84,925 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Mertens PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Miralles VS Samper-Montana H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-0 |
Stats 
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 6-3 6-0 | |||||
Miralles VS Samper-Montana H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 28 | Games Won | 26 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:11:0 | Average Match Time | 1:11:0 |
| 78% (105/135) | 1st Serve % | 70% (96/138) |
| 67% (70/105) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (55/96) |
| 53% (16/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (18/42) |
| 40% (8/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (3/9) |
| 47% (65/138) | Return Points Win % | 36% (49/135) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bernabe Zapata Miralles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
67%
(
83 of
124)
1st Serve %
66%
(
87 of
132)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
50 of
87)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
46%
(
57 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
62 of
132)
129
Total Points Won
127
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
88)
81
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
83%
(
72 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
89 of
125)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
53 of
89)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
19%
(
4 of
21)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
58 of
125)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
85)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Franco Agamenone
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Maxime Chazal
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve %
78%
(
43 of
55)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
50%
(
16 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
49
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Max Alcala Gurri
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
48%
(
43 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Daniel Rincon
79%
(
80 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
97
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Jordi Samper-Montana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gengo Kikuchi
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
9 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Len Schouten
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Palaphoom Kovapitukted
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ko Suzuki
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
90
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 0-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Shohei Chikami
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Toledo Bague
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (423/325) | Win/Loss | 56% (442/346) |
| 55% (951/775) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (986/809) |
| 52% (8252/7563) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8600/7785) |
| 49% (69/72) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (69/51) |
| 62% (304/185) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (372/287) |
| 42% (42/59) | Indoor Hard W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 47% (8/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1138 | Aces Total | 660 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1226 | Total Double Faults | 851 |
| 1:16:49 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 435.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 574.61 |
| 66% (28446/43022) | 1st Serve % | 64% (15981/24811) |
| 64% (18081/28446) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (10251/15981) |
| 49% (7146/14572) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4112/8830) |
| 46% (2140/4610) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1286/2812) |
| 42% (17454/41628) | Return Points Win % | 43% (10792/25132) |
| 54% (21/18) | Slam W/L | 33% (6/12) |
| 28% (7/18) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (50/58) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (6/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (157/131) | Challenger W/L | 44% (82/105) |
| 65% (187/99) | Futures W/L | 62% (348/217) |
| 57% (407/711) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (432/768) |
| 45% (10/22) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 47% (83/176) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (86/178) |
| 54% (115/213) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (117/224) |
| 87% (422/369) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (435/372) |
| 13% (422/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (435/63) |
| 17% (326/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (353/68) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
